
Not competitive = not sustainable. Not sustainable = not competitive.
The most comprehensive measurement of country competitiveness and sustainability. Based on 296 quantitative indicators from trusted international organizations, providing bias-free evaluation of country performance.
The GSCI is now officially used by governments to benchmark their progress on the path to sustainability and competitiveness, providing a comprehensive alternative to GDP for tracking ESG country performance.
The Global Sustainable Competitiveness Index (GSCI) is a fully integrated measurement of a country's performance and outlook. Based on 296 quantitative indicators derived from global organisations (various specialised UN agencies, the World Bank, the IMF), the GSCI measures all sectors, integrating macroeconomics, innovation capabilities, governance issues, society themes and the environment: the sustainable competitiveness of a nation. The GSCI is the most comprehensive country-level index available.
The GSCI serves as a comprehensive alternative to the GDP: GDP measures only what is exchanged in the market against money, but excludes everything else: environment, health, education, security, governance, and quality of living. The GSCI, in contrast, measures what makes success possible. The GSCI allows for assessing country-specific and issue-specific risks for operators and investors, and verifying development progress for countries on their path to sustainability and competitiveness.
Not competitive = not sustainable.
Not sustainable = not competitive.
Sustainable competitiveness is the ability to generate and sustain inclusive wealth without diminishing the future capability of sustaining or increasing current wealth levels.
The indicators of the GSCI are grouped into 6 sub-indexes: Natural Capital, Resource Efficiency & Intensity, Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, Economic Sustainability, and Governance Capital. Taken together, these pillars define a national performance and future outlook.
The given natural environment, including the availability of resources, and the level of the depletion of those resources
The efficiency of using available resources as a measurement of operational competitiveness in a resource-constraint World
Health, security, freedom, equality and life satisfaction within a country
The capability to generate wealth and jobs through innovation and value-added industries in the globalised markets
Economic Sustainability & Competitiveness reflects the ability to generate wealth through sustainable economic development
Results of core state areas and investments – infrastructure, market and employment structure, the provision of a framework for sustained and sustainable wealth generation
Explore how countries rank across all dimensions of sustainable competitiveness. Click any country to open its profile in a new tab.
Loading map data...
A global snapshot of sustainable competitiveness performance and trends
Current global performance
Sweden leads at 63%
Perfect sustainability
The Gap: The average score is 45%, less than 50% of the ideal. Even Sweden at 63% demonstrates that we're far from being truly sustainable and competitive.
Indicators showing positive trends
Indicators showing decline
No significant change
Mixed Progress: While 59% of indicators show positive developments, an alarming 36% are deteriorating. We are moving forward and backwards simultaneously.
Insights from the world's most comprehensive country sustainability assessment
Northern Europe (Scandinavia) continues to lead the Global Sustainable Competitiveness Index: Sweden tops the ranking, followed by Norway, Switzerland and Finland, with Denmark fifth. Iceland is ranked 7th.
Europe dominates the top 20: Japan (16th) is the only non-European nation in the top 20, with Taiwan 21st, South Korea 23rd and Singapore 25th. Lithuania (11th), Estonia (13th) and Latvia (19th) are all in the top 20.
Asia tops the Intellectual Capital Index, the basis of future competitiveness in a world dominated by technology: South Korea ranks first, Taiwan third and Japan fifth, with China 7th.
The Social Capital Index is headed by Slovenia, Norway and the Netherlands, followed by Iceland and Czechia, with Japan sixth: societies that combine high living standards with a broadly shared social consensus.
China ranks 7th in Intellectual Capital but only 34th overall: evidence of underlying problems in Natural Capital (167th) and Resource Efficiency (153rd), albeit with encouraging signs of efficiency improvements.
The USA is ranked 42nd, performing comparatively poorly in social capital (162nd) and resource efficiency (162nd), reflecting a decline that is potentially further undermining the global status of the US in the future.
Countries in Africa are facing challenges across the board, with a combination of poor scores in several dimensions. 11 of the 20 lowest-ranked countries are African, with low performance in social and intellectual capital, affecting the potential for real improvements in the short term.
The global gap to a perfectly sustainable and competitive world is 54.6 points. The world is still far from an inclusive and circular society that is truly sustainable and competitive.
A comprehensive alternative to GDP, measuring what truly drives sustainable competitiveness
Track competitiveness and policy effectiveness across 6 dimensions and 42 clusters
Assess country-level ESG risks and identify sustainable investment opportunities
Access bias-free data from trusted international organizations spanning 50+ years
Identify sustainable markets for expansion and assess operational risks
Access industry-specific risk evaluation, interactive analysis, and comprehensive ESG data through our professional dashboard. Designed for institutional investors, analysts, and business professionals.
Explore Dashboard PlatformAccess comprehensive reports, data, and insights



Sovereign Bond Credit Ratings based on the GSCI: ESG Sovereign Bonds
Download (1.4 MB)
Explore how countries rank across all dimensions of sustainable competitiveness
| Rank | Country | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sweden | 62.89 |
| 2 | Norway | 61.84 |
| 3 | Switzerland | 61.74 |
| 4 | Finland | 61.67 |
| 5 | Denmark | 61.32 |
| 6 | Ireland | 60.77 |
| 7 | Iceland | 60.02 |
| 8 | Luxembourg | 59.53 |
| 9 | Austria | 59.49 |
| 10 | United Kingdom | 58.98 |
| 11 | Lithuania | 58.86 |
| 12 | France | 58.72 |
| 13 | Estonia | 58.64 |
| 14 | Netherlands | 58.45 |
| 15 | Germany | 58.22 |
| 16 | Japan | 57.75 |
| 17 | Slovenia | 57.54 |
| 18 | Liechtenstein | 57.00 |
| 19 | Latvia | 56.80 |
| 20 | Poland | 56.29 |
| 21 | Taiwan | 56.13 |
| 22 | Belgium | 55.96 |
| 23 | South Korea | 55.91 |
| 24 | Slovakia | 55.77 |
| 25 | Singapore | 55.69 |
| 26 | Portugal | 55.57 |
| 27 | Croatia | 55.53 |
| 28 | Czech Republic | 54.79 |
| 29 | Italy | 54.26 |
| 30 | New Zealand | 53.74 |
Note: Showing top 30 countries. Click column headers to sort.
Access comprehensive data, rankings, and insights for 193 countries across 50+ years of sustainable competitiveness tracking. Our professional risk management platform provides interactive analysis and enterprise-grade tools for informed decision-making.